If there was ever a masterclass in political self-destruction, one needs to look no further than Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party. In the span of just a few years, Starmer has managed to take a historic electoral landslide and torch every bridge between his government and the concept of moral integrity. Whether it’s acting as the diplomatic wing of the Israeli war machine or employing the ephebophilic entourage of a dead sex trafficker, this government isn’t just out of touch—it is morally repugnant. And the public? They’ve noticed.
Shit arse shagging pedo Israel bum boys
The Human Rights Lawyer Who Forgave Genocide
Let’s rewind to the onset of the Gaza genocide in October 2023. While the world watched thousands of civilians being obliterated from the sky, Keir Starmer—a man who built his career on human rights law—decided to audition for the role of Benjamin Netanyahu’s press attaché. In a moment of staggering moral vacancy, Starmer went on LBC and defended Israel’s “right” to cut off water and electricity from 2.3 million trapped civilians .
It was a “cheerleading” effort for collective punishment, as even his ideological cousins in the Irish Labour Party pointed out, begging him to find a shred of human decency . But Starmer doubled down. He scrubbed the party of its anti-colonialist roots and instead turned Labour into a lobbyist’s dream: blocking Palestine motions from conference debates, gagging grassroots members, and pretending that 30+ motions for debate simply didn’t exist .
By September 2025, Starmer’s desperation was palpable. He tried to play damage control by vaguely waving at a two-state solution, but nobody was fooled. As Al-Akhbar aptly noted, recognizing Palestine was “no moral awakening”—it was a panic attack disguised as foreign policy .
But the mask slipped again almost immediately. While Palestinian children starved, Starmer welcomed Israeli President Isaac Herzog to London with a warm handshake rather than the handcuffs he deserved . Herzog—the man who signed the artillery shells fired into Gaza and claimed there were “no innocent civilians” there—was given the red-carpet treatment. Scottish National Party leader Stephen Flynn asked the question that echoed across the chamber: “What does it say of this prime minister that he will harbor this man whilst children starve?” .
It says everything. It says that Starmer’s Labour has no red lines, only red faces when the polling drops.
The Epstein Perfume: A Stench That Won’t Wash Off
If the complicity in Gaza wasn’t enough to sink this government, the stench of Jeffrey Epstein certainly is. And let’s be crystal clear: Keir Starmer may never have visited Little St. James, but he sure as hell hired the help.
In 2024, Starmer appointed Peter Mandelson—a man with more scandals than a red-top tabloid—as UK ambassador to Washington. Mandelson, it turns out, was buddy-buddy with Jeffrey Epstein long after the financier’s 2008 conviction for sex crimes against children. Emails revealed a chummy relationship, complete with jokey messages and $75,000 in suspicious payments flowing from Epstein to Mandelson’s circle .
When the dam broke, Starmer apologized. He stood at the dispatch box with the solemnity of a man who had just run over a neighbor’s cat, muttering that he was “sorry for having believed Mandelson’s lies” . But here’s the kicker: Starmer admitted in Parliament that the vetting process had revealed Mandelson’s continued friendship with Epstein before the appointment was made . He knew. He knew, and he sent him to Washington anyway.
As one political scientist put it, Starmer is now “a boxer on the ropes,” his administration teetering on the edge of collapse . Even his own MPs are sharpening the knives. Paula Barker confessed that Starmer’s “judgment is questionable”—which is the parliamentary equivalent of saying your pilot seems to be aiming for the mountain .
Unelectable and Despised
So, where does that leave Labour? According to the data, it leaves them in the gutter.
A June 2025 poll by Electoral Calculus found that defecting Labour voters think the party is “untrustworthy,” “not Labour enough,” and full of “liars” . The voters aren’t just flirting with the Greens or the Lib Dems; they’re openly mocking the party they once supported. “Labour are supposed to be left wing,” one voter scoffed, “not Tories with red ties” .
And it’s not just the left flank. The party is haemorrhaging support to Reform UK on the right over immigration, while the left flank is fleeing in droves over Gaza and the government’s vicious attacks on disabled people via benefit cuts . Starmer has managed the impossible: he has united the political spectrum—in hatred of him.
Meanwhile, the party machine is so terrified of its own membership that it blocks debate, stifles dissent, and treats its grassroots like a nuisance rather than a base . The result? A party that stands for nothing, led by a man who believes in nothing except the preservation of his own career.
Conclusion
Keir Starmer came to power promising “a return to honest government.” Instead, he gave us a government that facilitates genocide, cosies up to Epstein’s inner circle, and lies about it. He is despised by Muslims, despised by progressives, despised by the young, and frankly, he’s starting to bore the centrists too.
Labour isn’t just unelectable—it’s unpalatable. And as the walls close in, with by-election losses looming and police investigations circling Mandelson, Starmer might finally learn the lesson he should have learned in 2023: when you sell your soul for power, you usually end up with neither.